USPTO serial 73230873
MIGHTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 1989
- Examiner
- LAMONE, THOMAS S.
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MIGHTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
NORCROSS, GA
MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
INTERNACIONAL DE MARCAS Y VALORES, S.A.
SAN PEDRO GARZA GARCIA, NUEVO LEON, MX
Other trademarks owned by INTERNACIONAL DE MARCAS Y VALORES, S.A.
SAN PEDRO GARZA GARCIA, NUEVO LEON, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katharine F. Rowe
Katharine F. Rowe Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP50 N. Laura Street, Suite 2600Jacksonville, FL 32202United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by MDSA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by MIGHTY DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNACIONAL DE MARCAS Y VALORES, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GONCAL, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named MIGHTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2007 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1982 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 1982 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1981 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 1980 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1980 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1980 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |