USPTO serial 73232132
MAGIC MART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 1985
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAGIC MART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bluefield, WV
Bluefield, WV
Bluefield, WV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R. Brainard
CHARLES R BRAINARD & ARTHUR D GRAY KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's Shirts and Slacks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 16, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 1983 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 1982 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1982 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1981 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1980 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |