USPTO serial 73232270
RODEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1210936Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 1982
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RODEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. Diane Pitts
RICHARD S SILUK BAKER & BOTTS3000 ONE SHELL PLZHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1991 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 1991 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 1990 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1988 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 26, 1987 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1982 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 1982 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |