USPTO serial 73232415
NUTRI-DIET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRI-DIET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LA PRAIRIE, QUEBEC, CA
LA PRAIRIE, QUEBEC, CA
HERBORISTERIE VIBIO SANTE NATURELLE LTEE
LA PRAIRIE, CTE LAPRAIRIE, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by HERBORISTERIE VIBIO SANTE NATURELLE LTEE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN PETRY
LARSON AND TAYLOR727 23RD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY FOOD PREPARATION TO AID IN REDUCING WEIGHT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANTE NATURELLE A.G. LTEE
- Other trademarks owned by SANTE NATURELLE A.G. LTEE
- Other trademarks owned by HERBORISTERIE VIBIO SANTE NATURELLE LTEE
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NUTRI-DIET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 1988 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 1982 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1982 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |