Drawing for DESIGN CONCEPTS

USPTO serial 73245928

DESIGN CONCEPTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERESFORD, LYNNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGN CONCEPTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucas J. De Koster

LUCAS J DE KOSTER1106 MAIN STHULL, IA 51239UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting Services in the Field of Graphic Design, Logo Design, Design of Residences Including Floor Plans and Exterior Elevations, Interior Decoration and Space Planning for Commercial BuildingsABANDONEDJun 1, 1977

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1983ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 3, 1983ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 15, 1981PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 1981CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 1980CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance