USPTO serial 73255102
THE HUBCAPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- —
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE HUBCAPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCES RENDERED BY A INSTRUMENT AND VOCAL GROUP, SOLE AND PRODUCTION OF ITS OWN RECORDED ALBUMS, RECORDS AND TAPES AND VARIOUS MEMORABILIA | ABANDONED | Feb 17, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1982 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 11, 1981 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1981 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 1981 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |