USPTO serial 73256528
VINYLIZING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINYLIZING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUGENE F. BUELL
PITTSBURGH BUELL, BLENKO & ZIESENHEIMSTE 500 322 BLVD OF THE ALLIES, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | MATERIAL TREATMENT - NAMELY, APPLYING A CHIP RESISTANT COATING TO METAL SURFACES LIKELY TO BE SUBJECT TO ABRASION SUCH AS AUTOMOBILE BODIES | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 1984 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 28, 1984 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 1984 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 21, 1984 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |