Drawing for EXPRESSERVICE

USPTO serial 73256714

EXPRESSERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESSERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

No owner is listed on this record.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD E. BACKUS

FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITON & HERBERTSTE 3400 FOUR EMBARCADO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
No goods and services are listed.

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 28, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 16, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 1984JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 7, 1984CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 6, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 9, 1980CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance