USPTO serial 73259286
"SIZZLING" PLATTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1536888Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 1989
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with "SIZZLING" PLATTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR G. YEAGER
ARTHUR G. YEAGER Allen Dyer Doppelt Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.1301 Riverplace Blvd., Ste. 1916Jacksonville, FL 32207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ISLAND FOOD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by ISLAND FOOD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by ISLAND FOOD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CANDYLAND, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named "SIZZLING" PLATTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1989 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |