Drawing for RIPVILLE

USPTO serial 73261270

RIPVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1204139Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 3, 1982
Examiner
โ€”
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RIPVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul M. Denk

PAUL M DENK763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed StickersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 24, 1980
025Items of Clothing-Namely, Hats, and ShirtsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 24, 1980
026Belt BucklesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 24, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 1989C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)โ€”
Aug 3, 1982R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance