USPTO serial 73261837
SILAMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILAMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Larson
MARK S LARSON MESSERLI, ROE, BALOGH & KRAMER501 TITUS BLDG6550 YORK AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Silage Additive for Stimulation of Lactic Acid Production in Silage | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1983 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 1981 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 1981 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 1981 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |