USPTO serial 73264860
PHILLIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 1985
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, RON
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHILLIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CLEVELAND, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Westlake, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Rundelli
Raymond Rundelli CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRUIT TOPPING * SOLD AT WHOLESALE IN BULK AND IN INSTITUTIONAL SIZES OF CONTAINERS NOT INTENDED FOR DIRECT CONSUMER USE, AND NOT SOLD IN ASSOCIATION WITH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | FLAVORED SYRUPS USED AS TOPPING FOR ICE CREAM AND USED IN THE PREPARATION OF MILKSHAKES * SOLD AT WHOLESALE IN BULK AND IN INSTITUTIONAL SIZES OF CONTAINERS NOT INTENDED FOR DIRECT CONSUMER USE, AND NOT SOLD IN ASSOCIATION WITH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | CONCENTRATES AND SYRUPS USED IN MAKING SOFT DRINKS * SOLD AT WHOLESALE IN BULK AND IN INSTITUTIONAL SIZES OF CONTAINERS NOT INTENDED FOR DIRECT CONSUMER USE, AND NOT SOLD IN ASSOCIATION WITH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS SYRUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS SYRUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS SYRUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS SYRUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PHILLIPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2017 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 1995 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 13, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1984 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 15, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1980 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |