Drawing for ESQUIRE VIDEO CASSETTE

USPTO serial 73266316

ESQUIRE VIDEO CASSETTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUDGE, CONNIE M.
Law office
SENIOR TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR - NTB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 618: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ESQUIRE VIDEO CASSETTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video Tape CassettesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 1991OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 1985OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 1981CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1981DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 1981DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance