Drawing for TELABREAK

USPTO serial 73271787

TELABREAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1205658Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 1982
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELABREAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES B. SMITH

CHARLES B SMITH FISH & NEAVE875 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Security Services-Namely, the Centralized Monitoring of Burglar Alarm SystemsEXPIREDJun 25, 1980
037Security Services-Namely, the Installation of Burglar Alarm SystemsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 25, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 31, 1988C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 13, 1988815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 17, 1982R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 1982PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance