Drawing for LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DENTISTRY

USPTO serial 73273728

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DENTISTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1176680Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 3, 1981
Examiner
โ€”
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DENTISTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest A. Wegner

WEGNER, STELLMAN, MCCORD, WOOD & DALTON20 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016a Periodically Published Magazine Relating to Concerns of the Dental ProfessionSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 7, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 1988C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)โ€”
Nov 3, 1981R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance