USPTO serial 73276390
SIZZLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SIZZLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mission Viejo, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
SIZZLER RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by SIZZLER RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SIZZLER RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by SIZZLER RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tal Grinblat
Tal Grinblat Lewitt, Hackman, Shapiro, Marshall & Harlan16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARED MENU ITEMS NAMELY, STEAKS, AND DINNERS CONSISTING OF STEAK, POTATOES AND TOAST FOR CONSUMPTION ON AND OFF THE PREMISES | ACTIVE | Sep 2, 1963 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIZZLER USA FRANCHISE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SIZZLER FAMILY STEAK HOUSES
- Other trademarks owned by SIZZLER RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SIZZLER RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SIZZLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1987 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 28, 1987 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 20, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1983 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1983 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |