USPTO serial 73277097
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.
San Bernardino, CA
Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.
San Bernardino, CA
Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.
ORLANDO, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS R KASPER
Dennis R. Kasper c/o Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.100 Lake Hart Driver 3500ATTN: General Counsel's OfficeOrlando, FL 32832-0100| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | [ PLACING VOCATIONALLY TRAINED AND PROFESSIONAL VOLUNTEERS HERE AND ABROAD TO HELP OTHERS AND ] EVANGELICAL AND MINISTERIAL SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 11, 1976 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 20, 1989 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1983 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1982 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1982 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |