USPTO serial 73278481
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WARD, LALOS, LEEDS, KEEGAN & LETT
WARD LALOS, LEEDS KEEGAN & LETT1200 17TH ST N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANING FLUIDS FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY STYLUS CLEANING FLUIDS, TAPE HEAD CLEANING FLUIDS AND ANTI-STATIC FLUIDS | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIP- MENT, NAMELY TAPE HEAD CLEANERS, TAPE HEAD DEMAGNETIZERS, TAPE SPLICERS, STATIC TESTERS, STATIC REDUCERS, ANTI-STATIC TURNTABLE MATS, RECORD CLAMPS, AUTOMATICRECORD CLEANERS, STYLUS BALANCERS, DECK LEVELS, RECORD CARE KITS | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | BRUSHES FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY BRUSHES FOR AUTOMATIC RECORD CLEANERS AND HAND HELD RECORD BRUSHES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 1983 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1983 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 26, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |