Drawing for AUDIOPHILE EDITION

USPTO serial 73278481

AUDIOPHILE EDITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOPHILE EDITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WARD, LALOS, LEEDS, KEEGAN & LETT

WARD LALOS, LEEDS KEEGAN & LETT1200 17TH ST N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CLEANING FLUIDS FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY STYLUS CLEANING FLUIDS, TAPE HEAD CLEANING FLUIDS AND ANTI-STATIC FLUIDSABANDONED—
009APPARATUS FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIP- MENT, NAMELY TAPE HEAD CLEANERS, TAPE HEAD DEMAGNETIZERS, TAPE SPLICERS, STATIC TESTERS, STATIC REDUCERS, ANTI-STATIC TURNTABLE MATS, RECORD CLAMPS, AUTOMATICRECORD CLEANERS, STYLUS BALANCERS, DECK LEVELS, RECORD CARE KITSABANDONED—
021BRUSHES FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY BRUSHES FOR AUTOMATIC RECORD CLEANERS AND HAND HELD RECORD BRUSHESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 1983ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 8, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 1983REINREINSTATED—
Apr 26, 1983ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance