USPTO serial 73282826
ALCO-MISER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 1984
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALCO-MISER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Hudson
MARY L HUDSON ATTORNEY AT LAW150 GRANDE PASEOSAN RAFAEL, CA 94903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric-Powered Mechanism which, Through Control of the Specific Gravity of Solutions Used in Printing, Regulates the Content of Such Solutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royse Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Royse Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Royse Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ALCO-MISER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1990 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 1984 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 1984 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1984 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1983 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 1983 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 15, 1982 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1982 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |