Drawing for MISCELLANEOUS

USPTO serial 73282833

MISCELLANEOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISCELLANEOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARNOLD S. WEINTRAUB

ARNOLD S WEINTRAUB TROYBASILE, WEINTRAUB & HANLON900 TWR DR, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VIDEO PRODUCTS, NAMELY, VIDEO TAPES AND VIDEO DISCS.ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 1985ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 17, 1985EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 1985EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 16, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 31, 1984PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 5, 1984PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 1984PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 1984PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 1984PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 1984PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 1984EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 12, 1984PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 13, 1984PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 1983ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Nov 14, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1983CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 1981CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 1981DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 1981DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance