USPTO serial 73283387
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | IMPORTED ETHNIC GOURMET SPECIALTY FOODS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CANNED BAMBOO SHOOTS IN WATER, CANNED WATERCHESTNUTS IN WATER, CANNED WHOLE LYCHEES IN SYRUP, CANNED SLICED MANGOS IN SYRUP, CANNED WHOLE LONGANS IN SYRUP,CANNED FORMOSAN PINEAPPLE, CANNED FORMOSAN MUSHROOMS, CANNED BABY SWEETCORN, CANNED SOY BEAN SPROUTS, CANNED GOLDEN MUSHROOMS, CANNED OYSTER MUSHROOMS, CANNED ABALONE MUSHROOMS, PACKAGED SEEDLESS LONGANS, PACKAGED DRIED LYCHEE NUTS, AND SESAME SEED OIL | ABANDONED | Jul 22, 1975 |
| 030 | IMPORTED ETHNIC GOURMET SPECIALTY FOODS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PACKAGED DRIED RICE STICKS, PACKAGED MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE, PACKAGED RICE PAPER, PACKAGEDDRIED WHOLE CHILI; PACKAGED RICE FLOUR, PACKAGED SWEET RICE FLOUR, PACKAGED GREEN BEAN PASTE THREADS, PACKAGED SPICED SAUCE MIX, AND PACKAGED SIZZLING RICE PELLETS | ABANDONED | Jul 25, 1975 |
| 031 | ETHNIC GOURMET SPECIALTY FOODS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CANNED COCONUT MILK, CANNED BEAN CURD IN WATER,PACKAGED RED SMALL BEANS, PACKAGED DRIEDBLACK FUNGUS | ABANDONED | Jul 29, 1975 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1982 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1982 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |