USPTO serial 73284763
SCANTI PANTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCANTI PANTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FEMALE WEARING APPAREL -- NAMELY, FOUNDATION GARMENTS | ABANDONED | Aug 6, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 15, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 1986 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1983 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1982 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1982 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |