USPTO serial 73287901
OX-YOKE INN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 1986
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OX-YOKE INN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C. NEMMERS
JAMES C NEMMERS500 MNB BLDGP O BOX 2107CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1982 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1982 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |