Drawing for MC2

USPTO serial 73299073

MC2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1388070Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 1986
Examiner
JUDGE, CONNIE M.
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MC2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STANLEY B. GREEN

MEASUREMENT CONCEPT CORPORATIONPARKWAY 2STE. 201VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23452

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT AND PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, ONE OR MORE OF VIDEO TERMINAL(S), PRINTER(S), DISK(S), OR DISKETTES(S), DRIVES(S); COMPUTER PROGRAMS RECORDED ON DISK OR DISKETTE EXCEPT PROGRAMS FOR THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION FIELDS OR IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATINGSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
016PRINTED MATERIAL, NAMELY, INSTRUCTIONS AND DOCUMENTATION DESCRIBING AND EXPLAINING COMPUTER SOFTWARE EXCEPT IN THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION FIELDS OR IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATINGSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2005C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Dec 8, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 3, 2005CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Mar 24, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2000CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2000CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 1998PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 1992C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 26, 1992RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Oct 15, 1991PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
May 21, 1991815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 1, 1986R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 7, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 1984CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 1984CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1981CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1981DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance