Drawing for SANITIZED TREATED THE BUILT-IN DEODORANT

USPTO serial 73303402

SANITIZED TREATED THE BUILT-IN DEODORANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SANITIZED TREATED THE BUILT-IN DEODORANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
AClothing, Textiles, Leather Products, Paper Products, and Vinyl ProductsABANDONEDSep 1, 1975

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 1985OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 5, 1985OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 5, 1985ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 18, 1985OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Nov 18, 1985OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 7, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 13, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 25, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 24, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 21, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 19, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 27, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 11, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance