USPTO serial 73311340
SCRAMBLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCRAMBLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C.J. TUTTLE
ROBERT C J TUTTLE SOUTHFIELDBROOKS & KUSHMAN3000 TOWN CTR STE 2121, MI 48075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | LIGHT DUTY 4 WHEEL DRIVE SPORT UTILITY TRUCKS FOR USE ON OR OFF ROAD RUCKS FOR USE ON OR OFF ROAD | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1985 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1984 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 27, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |