USPTO serial 73313584
MOBAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1263318Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 1984
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOBAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Gitchel
JEFFREY M GITCHEL BAYER CORPORATE & BUSINESS SERVICES LLC100 BAYER RDPITTSBURGH, PA 15205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [Vitreous and Porcelain Enamels, Porcelain Enamel Frits, Ceramic Frits, Clay, Gums and Opacifiers for Ceramic Materials; Raw Materials and Chemicals-Namely, Barium Carbonate, Calcium Chloride, Magnesium Carbonate, Silica, Feldspar, Potash, Alum, Ammonia Alum, Zinc Oxide, Sodium Aluminate, Nepheline Syenite, Bentonite, Borax, Titanium Oxide, and Epsom Salts for General Use in Industrial Arts, and Chemicals Used as Suspending Media for Screening Pastes, Solvents, and Minerals and Chemicals-Namely, Alumina, Titanium Dioxide, Barium Salts, Borax, Boric Acid, Cadmium Salts, Calcium Salts, Copper Salts, Zinc Salts, Magnesium Salts, Manganese Salts, Potassium Salts, Sodium Salts, Feldspar, Fluorspar, Silica, Talc, Urea and Nepheline Syenite for Use in the Industrial Arts; Mold Powders, Metallurgical Powders, Fluxes and Slags for Use in the Metallurgical Industry; and Continuous Cleaning Frits for Use as Coatings to Produce a Continuous Cleaning Coating for the Inside of Domestic Cooking Ovens] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 6, 1980 |
| 002 | Pigments, Colors and Dyes, Pigments and Oxides for Ceramic Application, Glass Colors; Pigments, Colors and Dyes for Use in Paints, Plastics or Concrete Application | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 6, 1980 |
| 021 | [Extrusion Glasses and Specialty Glasses for Use in Industry] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 6, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mobay Chemical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mobay Chemical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by MOBAY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Mobay Chemical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BAYER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MOBAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 1989 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |