Drawing for HEAT & EAT

USPTO serial 73320918

HEAT & EAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAT & EAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARGARET R. HOLCOMBE

MARGARET R HOLCOMBE THE PILLSBURY COMPANY3764 PILLSBURY CTR200 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030PIZZAABANDONEDFeb 2, 1981
031POPCORNABANDONEDFeb 28, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 1985ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 17, 1985EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 1985EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 26, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 22, 1984JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 1984CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 13, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 1983CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 27, 1983CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 21, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 2, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance