USPTO serial 73322931
SNAP TOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1425338Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SNAP TOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CRYSTAL LAKE, IL
SEAQUIST CLOSURES FOREIGN, INC.
CRYSTAL LAKE, IL
CRYSTAL LAKE, IL
CRYSTAL LAKE, IL
CRYSTAL LAKE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL E SIEGEL
MARSHALL W SUTKER WOOD PHILLIPS KATZ CLARK & MORTIMERCITIGROUP CTR500 W MADISON STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661-4592Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | DISPENSING CLOSURES, FOR USE ESPECIALLY WITH PLASTIC CONTAINERS FOR LIQUID, THAT HAVE COVERS THAT MAY BE MOVED FROM A CLOSED POSITION TO AN OPEN POSITION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PITTWAY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SEAQUIST CLOSURES FOREIGN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PITTWAY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PITTWAY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by APTARGROUP, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SNAP TOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 28, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 10, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1985 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 28, 1983 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |