USPTO serial 73323720
MID CONTINENT EXPRESS SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MID CONTINENT EXPRESS SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CREDIT CARD SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 8, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 13, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 1983 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |