Drawing for TECHNICO

USPTO serial 73324759

TECHNICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TECHNICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chi-En Liang

STE 20539-21 CRESCENT STLONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic CalculatorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 1989OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 1989OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 1988ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 3, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 1983ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 19, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance