USPTO serial 73325163
PARAMOUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1403303Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARAMOUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOUISVILLE, KY
WESTCHESTER, IL
LOUISVILLE, KY
LOUISVILLE, KY
OAK BROOK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JO E OSBORN
Jo E. Osborn TreeHouse Foods, Inc.2021 Spring RoadOak Brook, IL 60523-1813UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ CANNED AND BOTTLED PICKLES, MAYONNAISE SPREAD, SLAW MIX, MINCE-MEAT, THOUSAND ISLAND DRESSING, ROQUEFORT DRESSING, MAYONNAISE-BASED SANDWICH SPREAD, ] CHILI CON CARNE [ AND SLOPPY JOE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ PICKLE RELISH, COCKTAIL SAUCE, MUSTARD-BASED SANDWICH SPREAD, ] TAMALES, [ TARTAR SAUCE, VINEGAR, APPLE CIDER VINEGAR AND DISTILLED VINEGAR ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PARAMOUNT FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THF EQUITIES, LP
- Other trademarks owned by PARAMOUNT FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PARAMOUNT FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TREEHOUSE FOODS, IINC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PARAMOUNT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | PRA9 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1983 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |