USPTO serial 73326225
FLAVOR FORCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAVOR FORCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin L. Hartz
EDWIN L HARTZ CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE201 S LAKE AVEPASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces and Toppings for Use on Ice Cream and Flavorings Used in Making Ice Cream | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 4, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |