USPTO serial 73328510
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Pollet
MICHAEL N POLLET KARPATKIN, POLLET, PERLMUTTER & BEIL708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Periodical Publications, Particularly Magazines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 1981 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 4, 1984 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 18, 1984 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 1984 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 1982 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |