USPTO serial 73328896
Serial No. 73328896
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1465487Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 1987
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 73328896?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PALMERSTON NORTH, NZ
PALMERSTON NORTH, NZ
PALMERSTON NORTH, NZ
Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, TX
PALMERSTON NORTH, NZ
1000 B.V. AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R Halloran
Charles R Halloran KPPB LLP2190 S. Towne Centre Place, STE 300Anaheim, CA 92806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | TWO PIECE ANIMAL EAR TAGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLFLEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ALLFLEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ALLFLEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ALLFLEX USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DELTA PLASTICS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGRI HOLLAND B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1983 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1982 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |