Drawing for VIDEO-VILLE

USPTO serial 73329222

VIDEO-VILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1223252Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 11, 1983
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEO-VILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD F. CONNORS

EDWARD F CONNORSROOM 739 INVESTMENT BLDG1511 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video Equipment and Related Merchandise-Namely, Pre-Recorded and Blank Video Tapes and Video DiscsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
041Rental of Video and Movie Equipment and AccessoriesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 1989CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 1989C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 19, 1987PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 1983R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 19, 1982PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 1982NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 1982CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance