USPTO serial 73331246
THE HOME SECURITY CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE HOME SECURITY CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LA CRESCENTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN E. BROWNSTONE
SUSAN E BROWNSTONE FULWIDER, RIEBER, LEE AND UTECHT3435 WILSHIRE BLVD90010LOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GOODS INCLUDING ELECTRONIC TERMINALS ANDSENSOE UNITS WITH A COMMUNICATOR AND TELEPHONE OR CABLE MODEM WHICH PERFORM PERSONAL AND SECURITY MONITORING COMMUNICATION SERVICES WITH CENTRAL MONITORING | ABANDONED | Oct 2, 1981 |
| 038 | SERVICES INCLUDING THE MARKETING, INSTALLATION MAINTAINANCE AND CENTRAL MONITORING SERVICE OF ELECTRONIC TERMINALS AND SENSOR UNITS IN CONNECTIONWITH THE PERSONAL AND BUILDING SAFETY SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | Oct 2, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |