USPTO serial 73332228
VW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VIVIANNE WOODARD INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
VAN NUYS, CA
Other trademarks owned by VIVIANNE WOODARD INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
BEAUTITECH INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
VAN NUYS, CA
VAN NUYS, CA
STUDIO CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW J. BELANSKY
CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MAKE-UP PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LIQUID MAKE-UPBASE, BLEMISH STICK, HIGH LIGHTER, ROUGE, BRUSH-ON BLUSHER, FACE POWDER, EYEBROWBRUSH-ON POWDERED COLORING, EYEBROW PENCCIL, EYE SHADOW, MASCARA, LIPSTICK, LIP LINER PENCIL; SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FACIAL CLEANSER, FACIAL FRESHENER, FACIAL MOISTURIZER, FACIAL CREAM, FACIAL SKIN TIGHTENER, EYE AND THROAT OIL, BODY CLEANSER, MILK BATH, BODY TALC, HAND AND BODY LOTION; HAIR PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIRSHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR THICKENECOLOGNE, SCENTED BODY LOTION, NAIL STRENGTHENER, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, CUTICLE CREAM, SUN TAN LOTION, SUN TAN OIL PERSONAL DEODORANT(SPRAY AND ROLL-ON), AND LIQUID HAND SOAP. | ABANDONED | Mar 31, 1976 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIVIANNE WOODARD INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BEAUTITECH INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WOODARD LABORATORIES
- Other trademarks owned by BRADLEY, JOHN SPENCER
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named VW
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1983 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |