USPTO serial 73333380
MOUNTAIN BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 1987
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOUNTAIN BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL R. BERESKIN
ROY HAROLD SAFFREY439 UNIVERSITY AVETORONTO, ON M5G 1Y8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPMAN FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NESTLE ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by NESTLE ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by NESTLE ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MOUNTAIN BLEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1993 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 24, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |