USPTO serial 73334792
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Washington, DC
BIG BOY RESTAURANT GROUP , LLC
SOUTHFIELD, MI
BIG BOY RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL LLC
WARREN, MI
Other trademarks owned by BIG BOY RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL LLC
BIG BOY RESTAURANT GROUP , LLC
SOUTHFIELD, MI
ELIAS BROTHERS RESTAURANTS, INC.
WARREN, MI
SOUTHFIELD, MI
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melanie T. Frazier, Esq.
Melanie T. Frazier, Esq. Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC450 W. Fourth StreetRoyal Oak, MI 48067-2557UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant Services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 1990 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 2, 1990 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 3, 1989 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1983 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 1982 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 1982 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1982 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |