USPTO serial 73334967
MAXIMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 1985
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen R. Morganstern
ALLEN R MORGANSTERN MORGANSTERN & QUATELASTE 104320 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics-Namely, Eye Shiners which Add Color to the Eye Area; Eye Sparklers which Add Sparkle and an Iridescent Look to the Eye Area; Translucent Powder which Sets and Seals the Makeup Foundation and Eliminates Shine; Creams which Relate to Cleansing Cream and Eliminates the Impurities of the Skin; Moisturizing Cream which Relates to Balancing the Moisture of the Skin; Cream Blush, a Cosmetic, which Adds Color but Color that Differs from the Skin; Treatments which Relate to Cleansing the Skin and Moisturizing the Skin; Nail Care which Relates to Nail Polishes for the Toenails and Fingernails, Mending of Split and/or Cracked Nails, Nail Extensions, Manicures which Include Nail Shaping, Cutical Care, and Nail Buffing; Powder Eyeshadows; Clay Foundation which Relates to Facial Masks; Eyebrow Pencils; Lip Gloss; Lipsticks; Mascara; Rouge; Lip Liners; Cream Rouge; Powder Rouge; Highlighters and Liquid Foundation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 11, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |