USPTO serial 73334992
DUST GUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUST GUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morris Relson
MORRIS RELSON DARBY & DARBY405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aerosol Cleaner for Removing Dust, Lint, and Other Foreign Substances from Photographic Equipment and Supplies, Audio and Audio-Visual Equipment, Electronic Apparatus, Horological Instruments, Office Equipment, Artistic Supplies and Other Delicate Articles | ABANDONED | Jul 23, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 1985 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 4, 1985 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 1983 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |