Drawing for MIGHTY FINE EATING

USPTO serial 73335277

MIGHTY FINE EATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIGHTY FINE EATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles W. Ryan

CHARLES W RYANSTE 1210, THREE ILLINOIS CTR303 E WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned VegetablesABANDONEDNov 20, 1980
030Food SeasoningABANDONEDNov 20, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1985ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance