Drawing for SYN-TECH

USPTO serial 73336535

SYN-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SYN-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mindy Buren

MINDY BUREN LEBOEUF, LAMB, LEIBY AND MACRAESTE 11001333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting Services in the Field of Synthetic FuelsABANDONEDAug 1, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 1984OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 19, 1984ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 13, 1984OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Aug 23, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 3, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 2, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 1, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 1, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 13, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 5, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 1983ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 10, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance