USPTO serial 73341227
AABEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AABEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Welter
MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH EDELL, WELTER & SCHMIDT1600 MIDWEST PLZ BLDG801 NICOLLET MALLMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance Servicing of Video Systems Computers and Electronic Appliances | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1984 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 23, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |