USPTO serial 73345468
PRO-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 1983
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin George Williams
STE 190010880 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | a Non-Shrinking Two-Component 100% Solid Expoxy System Combined with Special Fillers that Provides a Tough, Flexible, Self-Leveling Material; with Outstanding Chemical Resistance, Ideal for Filling a Crack and Expansion Joints in Concrete, Asphalt, Tile, Brick, Wood and Metals on Horizontal Surfaces; Suggested Areas of Use Include Food Processing Plants, Industrial Plants, Bridge Decks, Patios and Swimming Pool Decks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stephens Protective Coatings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named PRO-FLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1990 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 1983 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 1983 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 1983 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 23, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |