USPTO serial 73346858
CLEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 1988
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOCIETE D'ETUDES DE CHIMIE ET DE THERAPIE APPLIQUEES LABORATOIRES DE COSMETOLOGIE YVES ROCHER
LA GACILLY, FR
SOCIETE D'ETUDES DE CHIMIE ET DE THERAPIE APPLIQUEES LABORATOIRES DE COSMETOLOGIE YVES ROCHER
LA GACILLY, FR
LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ, FR
Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
SOCIETE D'ETUDES DE CHIMIE ET DE THERAPIE APPLIQUEES LABORATOIRES DE COSMETOLOGIE YVES ROCHER
LA GACILLY, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB26TH FL150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, FACE, NECK AND BODY LOTIONS, NIGHT CREAMS, DAY CREAMS, ANTIWRINKLE CREAMS, MILKS AND LOTIONS, CLEANSING LOTIONS, JELLIES, OILS AND CREAMS, MOISTURIZING AND REVITALISING CREAMS, FACE NOURISHING AND SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FACE VEGETAL PEELING MASKS, SUN CREAMS, SUN FOAMS, SUN OILS, SUN LOTIONS, AFTER-SUN SOOTHING MILK, DEPILATORY CREAMS, BODY DEODORANTS, TOILET WATERS, FLORAL WATERS, BODY TONIC WATERS, EAU DE COLOGNE, REFRESHER SACHETS, PERFUMES, FOAMING BATH GEL, FOAMING BATHS, SHOWER GELS, BATH OILS, TOILET SOAPS, MOISTURIZING FOUNDATION CREAM, FOUNDATION CREAMS, MAKE-UP FOUNDATION, TINTED CREAMS, BLUSHERS, BLUSHER STICKS, EYE-BROW PENCIL, EYE CRAYONS, EYE SHADOWS, LIQUID AND POWDER EYE-LINER, MASCARA, POWDER, LIPSTICKS, PEARLISED LIPSTICKS, LIP SALVE, CONCEALER STICKS, EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, REVITALISING LOTIONS FOR NAILS, TALCUM POWDER, EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER GEL, PHIALS CONTAINING SKIN CARE CREAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE D'ETUDES DE CHIMIE ET DE THERAPIE APPLIQUEES LABORATOIRES DE COSMETOLOGIE YVES ROCHER
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE D'ETUDES DE CHIMIE ET DE THERAPIE APPLIQUEES LABORATOIRES DE COSMETOLOGIE YVES ROCHER
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE D'ETUDES DE CHIMIE ET DE THERAPIE APPLIQUEES LABORATOIRES DE COSMETOLOGIE YVES ROCHER
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CLEA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 30, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Oct 11, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |