Drawing for CLEA

USPTO serial 73346858

CLEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1507670Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 11, 1988
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CLEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERLA M. KUHN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB26TH FL150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS, NAMELY, FACE, NECK AND BODY LOTIONS, NIGHT CREAMS, DAY CREAMS, ANTIWRINKLE CREAMS, MILKS AND LOTIONS, CLEANSING LOTIONS, JELLIES, OILS AND CREAMS, MOISTURIZING AND REVITALISING CREAMS, FACE NOURISHING AND SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FACE VEGETAL PEELING MASKS, SUN CREAMS, SUN FOAMS, SUN OILS, SUN LOTIONS, AFTER-SUN SOOTHING MILK, DEPILATORY CREAMS, BODY DEODORANTS, TOILET WATERS, FLORAL WATERS, BODY TONIC WATERS, EAU DE COLOGNE, REFRESHER SACHETS, PERFUMES, FOAMING BATH GEL, FOAMING BATHS, SHOWER GELS, BATH OILS, TOILET SOAPS, MOISTURIZING FOUNDATION CREAM, FOUNDATION CREAMS, MAKE-UP FOUNDATION, TINTED CREAMS, BLUSHERS, BLUSHER STICKS, EYE-BROW PENCIL, EYE CRAYONS, EYE SHADOWS, LIQUID AND POWDER EYE-LINER, MASCARA, POWDER, LIPSTICKS, PEARLISED LIPSTICKS, LIP SALVE, CONCEALER STICKS, EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, REVITALISING LOTIONS FOR NAILS, TALCUM POWDER, EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER GEL, PHIALS CONTAINING SKIN CARE CREAMSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 2, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 1, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 4, 19948.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 30, 19938.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 30, 1993XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Nov 30, 1993XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Oct 11, 1988R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 2, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 15, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 24, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 1984CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 23, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance