USPTO serial 73346897
GENTLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENTLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Paris Cedex 08, FR
Paris Cedex 08, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell H. Falconer
RUSSELL H FALCONER BRUMBAUGH, GRAVES, DONOHUE & RAYMOND30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair Care Products-Namely, Hair Shampoos, Hair Coloring Lotions, Hair Creme Rinses and Conditioners, and Hair Permanent Waving Lotions | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 3, 1985 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |