USPTO serial 73347319
MITSUBOSHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITSUBOSHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TRANSMISSION BELTS FOR INDUSTRIAL MACHINES, AGRICULTURE MACHINES AND AUTOMOBILES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 1985 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 1984 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 1984 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1983 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |