USPTO serial 73348672
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | CONSULTING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES IN THEFIELD OF THE STORAGE, USAGE AND FORMULATION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, NAMELY MINERAL OILS, WAXES, PETROLATUMS AND PETROLEUMSULFONATES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1988 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 20, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |